casual and competitive

A lot of the time when people come over I hand them the controller to play a game with me and then I proceed to watch them flounder around for five minutes before calling the game boring and quitting saying that they don’t like video games. You could argue that the game should be more accessible to people who don’t play a lot of games and you could also argue that the player is at fault for being so bad.

Gamers are the most suppressed minority because true gamers such as myself are extreme and are serious about the games they play, which means those filthy normies can’t understand the complexity of staring at a screen for five hours. Casual people are typically people who don’t play many video games if at all, and as a result are very bad and aren’t able to experience a good number of games. Party games that don’t take any skill are more common among casuals and difficult skill-based games are usually what real gamers play.

Which begs the question: should a game cater to casuals? In my opinion, the answer is yes. I think it’s entirely possible to make a game both accessible to newcomers and challenging enough for veterans. First off, casuals are casuals because they don’t want to dedicate time to playing video games all day, which means they won’t be good at them, which means they won’t like them, which means they won’t want to dedicate time to playing video games all day. Gamers spend all day staring at a monitor and as a result are very good at video games. The skill gap between the two is enormous. Even someone who isn’t extreme but still plays games as a hobby will absolutely demolish someone playing for the first time, or the seventh time, or even the hundredth time.

Video games are very hard to get into especially if you haven’t started playing them since a very young age. The thing is, after playing a game for the first time, you’re not going to see any results. Even after playing for three months you might not see any results, at least nothing significant. And that’s what turns people away. The lack of results. It feels like your efforts aren’t getting you anywhere.

The problem for most people (at least from what I’ve seen) is that people are uncomfortable with the controller. On the NES, there was a d-pad, two buttons, start, select, and that’s it. Just by looking at it once you can understand what it’s all about. Look at a modern controller with a left stick, right stick, d-pad, four buttons on the front, two triggers, two bumpers, L3, R3, start, and select. It’s a lot more to take in and constantly I tell people to press a certain button and they have to look down and find where it is, even after having used that button multiple times.

Now, the controllers aren’t just getting more buttons for no reason. As technology advances the games get bigger and have bigger ideas, which means more buttons that will have to be used in order to play all these big ideas. So you’re kind of stuck: use less buttons to cater to casuals, or use more buttons to cater to gamers who want a bigger experience. Honestly there should be an in between. Inevitably some games are going to have to use all the buttons but a lot of the games I play just have a lot of buttons that aren’t being used for anything.

I think Nintendo is the company most casuals go for when they want to play a game, because be honest, no casual would ever buy an Xbox or Playstation, probably because it comes off as too hardcore. Nintendo seems a lot more newcomer friendly in that regard.

The Wii is a console that came out a while ago, 2006 or 2007 I think, and that was the casual machine, which is why it sold so well. It was the only console competing at the time that was trying to cash in on the casuals while the Xbox and Playstation were fighting for the gamers. As a result a lot of gamers turned up their elitist heads and decided they were too cool for the Wii. But the casuals loved it because of how simple it was.

First: the controller. Point it at the screen and press A or B. Simple as that. For other games: turn it on its side, use the d-pad and the buttons labeled 1 and 2. I think they were trying to make the controller similar to a TV remote since that’s what casuals would be most familiar with, and it worked.

Second, the library. There are hardly any hardcore games on Wii because no gamers owned a Wii, the Wii didn’t have enough buttons for a hardcore game, and the Wii’s hardware was weak compared to the Playstatin and Xbox. Thus, the Wii’s library is flooded with casual party games. Simple, low skill games for casuals to enjoy. And apparently it worked because the Wii sold better than the Playstation 3 and Xbox 360, the other two competing consoles at the time.

For Nintendo’s next console I assume they were trying to cater to both casuals and gamers with the Wii U. It had more buttons but also the same friendly Wii vibe. It also sold terribly and was a huge failure. There’s a lot of guesses as to why it did so bad. My guess is that casuals just got tired of casual games which makes sense considering how simple they are.

Anyhow Nintendo’s next move was releasing the Switch which did really well and catered to casuals and gamers alike so I guess it can be done. The controller might be too scary for some but then you turn it on its side and play with only one joycon and suddenly it’s not so bad.

so guys, i hoped you enjoyed my blog. Don’t bother responding because your opinion is wrong and you’re just a hater. sayonara!

when should a story get good

What irritates me to no end is when people say something really braindead like “Oh yeah I know the game has a slow start but it gets good forty hours in I swear!” Yeah okay smooth brain you think I’m going to waste forty hours of my life just to enjoy an alright game? No.

When I watch anime I usually decide if I’ll keep watching past the first episode within twenty minutes. Sometimes I watch for only five minutes before dropping it. And that’s because the show isn’t interesting at all. It didn’t present anything new, it didn’t have any interesting characters or settings, nothing at all.

Of course you could argue that dropping a show within the first five minutes is a little too early to decide whether or not its worth my time. And you’re right about that.

But think of it this way. Most people don’t read an entire book and then decide whether or not they liked it. Most people read the first few chapters and if they don’t like it they’ll stop reading. Which is why it’s so important for the first chapter to hook the reader. Even this first sentence should ideally catch the reader’s attention although this is pretty difficult to do.

Now back to video games. There seems to be a big problem with video games where the first hour or so is filled to the brim with cutscenes and tutorials. To the point to where you’re wondering when you get to play this video game. It could be that the developers aren’t in such a hurry to hook the player since nobody is going to drop a game within the first five minutes especially if it’s one of the first-party games that cost sixty dollars, the same way nobody is going to exit the movie theater after five minutes since they’ve already paid for their ticket. I guess the mentality is I’ve already paid for it so I’ll experience it even if I don’t like it.

Confession: I don’t know anything about writing, probably due to the fact that the only form of writing schools care about are essays. However I do have a few thoughts on how to start a story. A unique setting or cast of characters always helps, immediately starting off with a cool action scene is pretty common, and the best way, in my opinion, is starting at a bizarre place. Either by having the setting and events not making sense which leads the viewer into wanting to know what is going on or by starting not at where a story typically starts but at the climax near the end. It’s a pretty common cliche that I’m sure everyone has seen a million times: there’s some sort of crazy event going on and then everything freezes and the main character says something cliche like “Yep. That’s me. You’re probably wondering how I got here.” And then the cliche happens where time goes back to the beginning of all the events and the entire movie is explaining how things got to that scene in the beginning.

It’s been done to death and is pretty stupid at this point but there must have been some reason for it becoming so overused. That must be proof that it’s an effective way to start a story.

There’s absolutely nothing interesting about listening to two characters exposition dump in order to explain everything that’s going on. A lot of shows must think that people like hearing other people talk about other people or places. Maybe everyone else does but I don’t. It’d be more understandable if the setting was a really out there concept that would be really hard to comprehend without someone telling you how it works but a lot of anime and video games just reuse an already done setting which makes me wonder why they bother to explain it at all.

The main character is just having a monologue for the first five minutes droning on about some chimp brain garbage like “I was reincarnated in this fantasy world with magic and monsters and you can level up by killing monsters and blahdogshdlgsjhld” and I’m just staring at the screen thinking Shut up already or I’ll rip your spine out. You could probably search up “fantasy kingdom”, find a random image, and it’d illustrate the show perfectly.

The last thing I want to talk about is how unoriginal everything is. Obviously all stories borrow some elements from each other but a good chunk of them just feel like the same thing but with a different coat of paint. I’m sure there’s a point where generic action films and boring romance movies will get old but Hollywood doesn’t seem to think so. My favorite pieces of work are when something new and different is tried and even though the idea sounds stupid on paper it somehow miraculously works and it works so well especially because it’s something I’ve never seen before. This doesn’t mean that different is good; there’s a lot of shows with something new but just don’t work because the idea is stupid. It takes a true genius to take that stupid idea and make it good. I don’t think there are any bad premises for a story, only that some ideas are harder to execute that others.

so guys, i hoped you enjoyed my blog, don’t bother responding because your opinion is wrong and you’re just a hater. sayonara!

#ForcedToWriteBlogDuringBoycott

Currently I’m on strike because I’m writing blogs but I don’t believe I’m getting enough money for the work I do since I make about 0.00 US dollars per blog and while that is above minimum wage in a sweatshop somewhere I don’t believe my pay reflects the quality of my work.

This opening sentence brings me to my point: does art imitate life, or does life imitate art?

I think this is sort of a dumb thing to ask because of course art imitates life and frankly if you disagree you are a hater and probably have a low intelligence quotient which shortened is called IQ. The more you know. I’m pretty sure I know more than you because I took the IQ test (IQ stands for intelligence quotient) and it says I got 112 so yeah I’d say I’m pretty knowledgeable. I’m not willing to change my viewpoint on anything because I am right as usual.

Which brings me to my next point: why do people like to ask stupid questions?

Is water wet? What came first, the chicken or the egg? What is the meaning of life? Whoever came up with these questions must have a lot of free time on their hands because I couldn’t fathom spending time thinking about things that don’t matter.

Which brings me to my next point: why do I have to learn about all these different school subjects? When am I going to need to know how physics works when I’m looking to land a job as a banker, or an athlete? Personally I believe that students should pick from a variety of subjects that cater to the career they are wishing to pursue.

Which brings me to my next point: why do people think they know better everyone else? What makes people think that their ideas for how the world should work is just outright better than what everyone else thinks?

Which brings me to my next point: why are people so deeply invested in politics? That’s all i’m going to say on that matter I don’t want to be cancelled.

Which brings me to my next point: why isn’t anyone accepting of other people’s opinions? There isn’t anything that really makes any person’s opinion more valid that another’s.

Which brings me to my next point: why do some people have some stupid opinions? This might sound rude but you might really have a screw loose if you think fairy Tail is not the greatest show, no, the greatest form of media ever created. I will defend Fairy Tail to the death if I have to.

Which brings me to my next point: why do people bother arguing? If someone is passionate enough about a belief that they’re willing to argue about it, I doubt one conversation is going to change their mind. I’m pretty sure arguing is just for self satisfaction and the prospect of totally owning your opponent with facts and logic.

Which brings me to my last point: why does everyone have to be so sensitive? my ideal world would be one where everyone is just chilling although I know that will never happen. Even if there was a fair way decide how humanity would survive if everyone was doing nothing all day it’d still be impossible because everyone is always at each other’s necks for some reason or the other.

so guys, I hope you enjoyed my blog. don’t Bother responding because your opinion is wrong and you’re just a hater. sayonara!

teacher run over by big cheese???!! (not clickbait) (police called) (gone wrong)

So today I was sitting in the bus and heading home. I usually just play some games on my phone until it’s my turn to get off. That’s why I didn’t notice for a while but then I realized we were going back to the school for some reason. Nobody else seemed to have noticed until we went to a complete stop by the sidewalk and everyone starting looking around.

The bus driver opened up the door and Mr. Monopoly came up and talked to her. If you’re wondering his name isn’t actually Mr. Monopoly it’s just that he looks like that guy from the Monopoly board game so everyone calls him that. To be honest I don’t actually know what his last name is, I just know his first name, which is Larry.

Now that I think about it, Mr. Monopoly might be his actual name. I’ve never heard anyone call him anything else.

Anyway the bus driver who is this nice old lady opened up the door for Mr. Monopoly and they started talking for a bit. I was wondering what was up because our bus was the only one the stayed behind; the rest had left to drop off the other kids. The two chatted for a bit and I picked up some bits of their conversation. One word that caught my attention was “accident”. Another was “replacement driver”.

Immediately I stupidly assumed that our bus crashed into something or got a flat tire but I definitely would have felt it if that happened. Mr. Monopoly and the bus driver were sort of laughing and Mr. Monopoly told her that “accidents happen”, and was saying something about how she didn’t see her, so I then assumed she had left a student behind on accident.

This was my conclusion for a while until this squeaky voiced fifth grader in the front asked the bus driver why we were waiting so long. And the bus driver told us that apparently when she had been pulling out, one of the safety patrols ladies was bending over and got her foot run over by the bus. All of us were just staring at each other with this wide-eyed look and most people were half-laughing. I wasn’t sure if I should laugh too or if I should just stay quiet.

Eventually someone came and started interrogating the bus driver. I think it was a police officer although I couldn’t tell since he never entered the bus. Whoever it was, he asked the bus driver a few questions like “Was it an accident?” and then took her away to who knows where. A replacement driver came and then we all went home.

anyway, I hoped you enjoyed, don’t bother responding because your opinion is wrong and you’re just a hater. sayonara!

why webtoon is now the big stinky

When I first started reading weebtoons I thought they were pretty cool but now I realize they are really bad and I was only reading them because I had run out of things to watch. I think the main problem is that weebtoons only appeal to a certain demographic of weebs and koreaboos.

Now you probably thought I would be ranting about how much i hate webtoon but it was actually a trap as I’ll be ranting about how much i hate romance webtoons. As any intellectual webtoonian knows there can be only two types of romance stories: a story where a girl meets a falls for a dashing and charming man who comes from a royal bloodline or a story about two gay dudes. If you want to get extra spicy then add a love triangle. Everybody knows that an original and creative idea like that is sure to up the drama.

The thing about all these stories is that they never seem to exist because the author had a wonderful romance to tell, it just seems to exist for some wish fulfillment. I don’t know how many times you can tell a story about a girl marrying a prince and becoming a queen before it gets old and tiresome.

Confession: I have not actually read many of the romance weebtoons. I have only read two and stopped reading after the second chapter because they were boring. So in order to properly criticize these stories I’m going to go read a few.

So I got a little sidetracked because I ended up reading a little longer than I thought I would. My conclusion has changed a bit. Not all romances on webtoon are generic cliched garbage. They’re all just mediocre stories that use a lot of cliches which include: the love triangle, the generic protagonist designed to relate to as many people as possible, the fact every character of the opposite gender is attracted to the protagonist, the love triangle, the love interest dying at the end, the love triangle… Did I mention that I think love triangles are stupid? Because I do.

you can have a wrong opinion

People are always spouting garbage about how their opinion is subjective and that they’re allowed to enjoy whatever they want and you can’t say that they’re wrong. These are the same kind of people who get extremely defensive about their interests and hobbies. Instead of defending why they think said thing is enjoyable, they use the tried and true, “It’s just my opinion,” and “Why are you getting so mad over my own opinion?”

There’s nothing wrong with preferring orange juice over apple juice (even if I disagree with that). That’s a justifiable and reasonable opinion. Although, sometimes people say the most idiotic things and I can’t help but stop and wonder if something in their head is wrong. Now, I can’t disprove their opinion, because it is an opinion. I just think it’s a really bad one.

Like, if some clown says that they think beastiality is okay and should be legal. I can’t provide evidence to disprove their opinion but I’m sure that most people would not agree with this opinion, to the point where it might even be considered wrong.

Do I think that people should be shamed for an opinion? Depending on the situation, yes. You’re probably thinking that I’m a terrible human being to think that people should be punished just for an opinion, but I’m not the one making the rules. If someone posted something like a white supremacy article then I’m sure they’d be attack by a community of angry people, and rightfully so. Because even if their claims can’t be disproved, it’s still regarded as “wrong”.

Of course there are less extreme examples and some people might have a different opinion on this matter but I think you can also have a wrong opinion on something that has less to do with morals and more about tastes in media. Like if someone says that Naruto is the best anime.It’s sentences like this that makes me scratch my head and think to myself. Is this person okay? Why do they think that? Do they truly believe that what they’re saying is true? Is Naruto the only show they’ve ever seen?

Again, I can’t disprove them.

But hearing them talk just makes me think that their opinion is very ill-informed.

 

fire emblem and why i hate it

so I was playing some Fire Emblem Fates today and I came across this one level that I found very difficult. Typically when this sort of thing happens I just do it over and over again until I’m able to beat it which is what I did today. But after four hours of trying I gave up because it was too difficult. The game is horrible; not my fault.

I’m sure nobody reading this will really understand what I’m talking about so I’ll make this quick. To complete the stage you have to reach the other side while taking out enemies that continuously respawn. You either escape or die.

Which sounds like a fun premise. And it would be. however the problem is that I only had six units; the rest of my army had died in a few unfortunate accidents. The level, with my six units, were practically impossible. clearly it was intended for the player to have around ten to fourteen units still alive. You’d have to get extremely lucky to beat one of the most punishing levels in the game with only four mediocre units and two garbage ones.

Now, is this my fault for letting almost all of my thirty man army die or is it the developer’s fault for overlooking this?

It’s not my fault of course since I’m never wrong.

Anyhow.

After four long frustrating hours I decided to be rid of all my dignity and play on casual mode, which is the mode where your units don’t permanently die. Many people including myself see it as the ultimate coward mode, the mode your four year old sister plays. I didn’t want things to come to this but it was either playing on the baby mode or restarting the game entirely, which, is not something I’d like to do if I wished to keep my sanity.

what really baffles me is that once you change to casual mode, there’s no going back. My original plan was to use casual mode for just this level but if you change your difficulty you’re stuck with it.

Anyway. After I switched to casual the level I had spent so long trying to complete was finished in five minutes.

Which begs the question as to which mode was more fun. The normal difficulty was tedious and painful to get through but casual mode seemed too easy. After I finished a level on the normal difficulty I would celebrate and pat myself on the back for thinking through a particularly hard level. On casual mode I just did whatever I felt like and didn’t care at all when I won.

THe thing is, casual mode is completely braindead. In the normal mode the game only ended when your character dies or if your favorite unit dies and you want to reset and save them. In casual mode the only way to lose is for all of your units to fall, which pretty much never happens. I started to think, “If I can’t die, then I’ll just do whatever I want.”

It’s a strategy game. I should actually have to think. But no, pushing my units forward recklessly worked for some reason. at that point, why even play a strategy game?

anyway, that was my perfectly unbiased review of the entire fire emblem series, I hope you enjoyed, don’t bother responding because your opinion is wrong and you’re just a hater.sayonara!

 

fire emblem and why i like it

When I first heard about Fire Emblem I was like “Ew I don’t want to play chess” but then I heard that it is actually a dating simulator and then I knew I had to play it.

Fire Emblem is a tactical strategy RPG that also doubles as a dating simulator. You use your units on a grid to wipe out the opposing forces, and if your unit dies, they stay dead forever. This means whenever my favorite unit dies I have to reset the game.

However.

Nobody actually plays this game for the chess.

They play it for the dating simulator.

You can increase the bond between your units to make them do more damage or something but I just use it to ship people.

Also you can get children and send them into the battlefield and kill them or whatever lol

In all seriousness Fire Emblem is like what chess would be if it wasn’t boring. All your units have different attacks, weapons, movement, and abilities, some units being better than others.

There’s this one poo poo head on my team named Lorenz and he does like three damage on a good day and on a bad day he misses the enemy and dies by a counterattack. I really hate him but I’m going for a no death run so I have to reset when he dies which is annoying.

There are three difficulty levels in Fire Emblem: Three Houses. If you’re a beginner you’ll want to start with Normal or Hard since both of those modes are a cakewalk. I thought the game was super easy and then I went on Maddening mode and I realized that I actually have to think now? Like actually plan out my moves? The way I had been playing was just using my best unit to kill everything but now I can’t do that anymore.

So yeah don’t pick Maddening if it’s your first time.

The two Fire Emblem games you should play first if you’re looking to get into the series is either Fire Emblem: Three Houses or Fire Emblem Awakening.

Awakening is only available on the 3DS though so I’m not sure how accessible it is.

Which means Three Houses is probably going to be the one that most people play.

In Three Houses you’re a teacher dude (or girl) who sends literal children into battle (like an actual fifteen year old).

Three Houses is a baby game because it is the first Fire Emblem game to include a rewind feature, which means if you make a bad move you can go back a few turns and undo it. However, you can only rewind so many times so it’s not a permanent safety net.

Oh, I should probably talk about the setting.

Despite having that weeaboo anime art style the setting of the game is a European medieval castle kind of place. Everyone is fighting with swords or bows and riding on horseback. All the types of weapons have advantages and weaknesses.

Swords lances and axes have a pretty good damage output but have a short range.

Bows can take on enemies from afar but do little damage and bow users typically have less health and defense.

Magic people are like the same as bows but do more damage which kinda makes bows useless but my favorite character uses a bow so I still use them.

Cavaliers (horse people) have high movement and damage but die easily to magic.

And flying types (wyverns and pegasuses or maybe pegasi) have even higher movement than the cavaliers but do less damage and can be easily taken out by bows.

So yeah that’s pretty much Fire Emblem and why I like it. Don’t bother responding because you’re opinion is wrong and you’re just a hater. sayonara!

WHAT?! MY ROBLOCKS GIRLFRIEND CHEATED ON ME?! (PRANK GONE WRONG) (ALMOST DIED)

Omg guys you won’t believe what just happened! My roblocks girlfriends cheated on me!!! that makes me so madd!

So like I was playing Adopt Me!, and if you don’t know what that is it’s like a gacha game where you collect cute little Pokemon my favorite one is the ultra secret rare rainbow unicorn which has a 0.0002% drop rate which makes me mad because I want it! Of course you can pay 40000 robucks for it but I poor 🙁

As I was saying, I got a roblocks girlfriend her name is Krystal|Depressed|Gets Angry When You Touch Tail|14 years old|Tsundere|Cute|Very Smart|Can Fly|Most Powerful|

Krystal|Depressed|Gets Angry When You Touch Tail|14 years old|Tsundere|Cute|Very Smart|Can Fly|Most Powerful| is my uwu girlfriend and we are so uwu together i took like six pictures of us together and we went on some very romantic dates like the time we went to Royal High together and visited each others apartments and it caught on fire that was an uwu romantic moment.

But then I wanted to make money I mean I wanted to make good content so I made a youtube channel and made a video to see if my girlfriend would cheat on me and she did!!!

I made a fake avatar and his name is Chad|Very Cool|Secretly Depressed|Vampire|Tries To Keep Evil Powers in Check|Easily Embarrased|Fifteen Years Old|

So I had my girlfriend and my fake character meet up and I asked her if she had a boyfriend and she said no!!! That lying ———!!!

oh crap I said a no no word now I won’t get monetization for this

Anyway, I asked her if she wanted to date and she said yes!! She’s a cheater!!

So like chris hanson I busted into the room with the illumina sword i bought for 600 robucks and killed her! That cheating poo poo head got what she deserved! Then I hacked her account and deleted her forever! Haha, that’s what you get! And then, I revealed her real name and contact info and her address. Karma!

so the moral of the story is, a women are cheaters. am I right fellas, or am i right?

Anyhow, that concludes my epic prank, I hope you guys enjoyed, don’t bother calling me out for doxxing a kid who is probably eight, your opinion is wrong and you’re just a hater. sayonara!

animal crossing is a game for stupid little children

About two months ago I got this game called Animal Crossing New Horizons because everyone said it was a fun game but guess what? They were wrong, and I would know because I’m never wrong.

So let me talk about why Animal Crossing is a poo poo game for dumb little kids.

First of all, there is no crossing animals nor is there a new horizon which is already false advertising and Nintendo should be sued for claiming their game is something that it is not.

Secondly, there are no good hair styles.

Third, are the animals have the personality of a cardboard box. It’s like somebody made the same “nice” character over and over again and added one quirk about each of them to make it seem like they have different personalities. Like “animal that likes working out and is nice” and “animal that likes bugs and is nice” and “animal that likes singing and is nice”. Very lame. The major appeal of the game is interacting with the animals but every time I talk to them I don’t feel like I’m talking to a real villager I just feel like I’m talking to an NPC recycling the same dialogue over and over.

Fourth, your tools break every five seconds. Each game that has a weapon durability system has it placed there for a reason, like Minecraft, but Animal Crossing has a durability system just because other games have a durability system. There’s literally no reason for it to exist but it does anyway. This wouldn’t bother me much if the fifth reason why this game sucks didn’t exist.

Fifth, every single quest in the game is a fetch quest, and by fetch quest I mean this poo poo head Tom Nook says “hey, uh durr i too stooopid to git my own supplies to make thing so u go cut down fifty million trees so i can make wooden hut.” You have to hit rocks and trees a million times over and over until you get the right materials because sometimes you can cut and entire tree down and not get the right type of wood. On top of this your things are breaking too so every third three you hit you have to go gather some sticks to make a new axe.

Sixth, everything in this game moves sooooo slow, and I know the point of the game is that it’s a slower paced casual game but this really is too much. If you got to a crafting table and interact instead of opening up the crafting menu it will say “Do I want to craft something?” and there will be a yes and no prompt. Of course I want to craft something you stupid game why else would I touch the crafting table??? Everytime you want to enter a builidng or house you have to watch an animation of your character putting away their equipped item and then watch them knock on the door to the house and then watch them open it and then watch them close it and then watch them enter the house. Every time you buy an item from the ATM it kicks you out of the menu so you have to interact with the ATM and go back to the store if you want to buy another item which makes me very mad.

Seventh, sometimes there’s absolutely nothing to do and you have to wait real life days for something to happen. Of course you can just change the date on your Switch to trick the game into thinking a day has passed but I don’t care enough about this game to go through the hassle of changing the date and then changing it back.

Eighth, sometimes I stop playing the game and when I come back like a week later some new weirdo has showed up in town and starts acting all buddy buddy with me like we’ve known each other for years with no introduction at all and it’s very jarring. Like I came back to the game one day and suddenly Isabelle was on my island for some reason announcing the news like she’d been there forever. I tried to kick her out but you can’t do that so I’m stuck with her.

Ninth, some animals are just copy and pastes of other animal. I opened up a plot of land to sell and when I came back somebody bought it. The person who bought it looks just like some of my other villagers just with a different color.

Tenth, there is no reason to play multiplayer because you can’t really do anything with the people that visit your island, just walk around and give them a tour or something which is lame.

Eleventh, one time I gave this villager a present I think it was a t shirt or something and in return he gave me a dress like ew wtf I’m not a girl.

Twelfth, sometimes I see the villagers just hanging around my house like some creepy stalker or something and I try to hit them with my shovel to make them go away but apparently they are very durable and the shovel just bounces right off.

Yeah so that’s why animal crossing is a poopy stinky game for losers don’t bother responding because my opinion is right and you’re just hater. sayonara!!!